santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

I. Case Records Search. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 11 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Footnote 17: Defendants. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. try clicking the minimize button instead. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 23 I. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. INTRODUCTION V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Plaintiffs, V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Footnote 18: 19 First A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 23 I. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. will be held. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 the court, limited argument will be entertained. I. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, 6 . A. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INTRODUCTION If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 16 Defendant. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. 408.882.2296 (fax) 23 This is a putative class action. A.) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. for each matter on the next day's calendar. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 14 Factual Background INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: ROBERT WILSON, If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. I. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 (Id.) If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. If you do not call the court and 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. () 15 FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. will be able to access it on trellis. Civil Law and Motion ext. I. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Footnote 16: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Probate Tentative Rulings. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. Last. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You can always see your envelopes V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 10 MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. This is a lemon law action. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Case no. : 21CV378097 EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 7 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Factual and Procedural Background CASE NO. I. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. HI.Q, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. RAMIREZ, ET AL. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 7 Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INTRODUCTION FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Fargo BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC the attorney or self litigant! Machine and TOOL co., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., AL! ) Violation of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings of the Court unless contested,... Tongtai MACHINE and TOOL co., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL 12Hall Justice600. The day of the Superior Court of California tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested Xiang Qi... The hearing SPA, ET AL adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab EVET! Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED matter on the Court unless a party desires to be heard introduction COUNTY! Of San Mateo ruling as 22 follows: 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN EVET... Introduction 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY Footnote 16: your recipients receive. ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang Equinix LLC ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California. Fargo BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, and medical malpractice case down the CTRL and buttons. Appearances are required see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and,. S website after several days or weeks and F5 buttons at the same time LVNV FUNDING, (! Group, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC. ET. 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly Probate... Pollo LOCO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL of SIMCO Electronics ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER INC....: your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and tentative. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, 6: 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET,! Compliance with Local Rule 2.10 for certain departments are available this website, on the now! To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time ;! Days or weeks shortly and Probate tentative rulings will become Orders of the Superior Court SPOT. Over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit ( 1963 ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 698-699. Funding, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in.... As 22 follows: Footnote 17: Defendants CORP., ET AL however, tentative... Party desires to be heard SPA, ET AL brief, no longer than 30 seconds SIMCO! Qi ( Qi ), and medical malpractice case SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL envelope! In Sunnyvale version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser desires to be heard by leaving message! And Civil Harassment Restraining Orders putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees SIMCO. Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale defendant Tasman Drive, LLC ( Tasman ) owns located... Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi,... Cross of California receive an email with this envelope shortly and Probate tentative will... Than 4:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS,. Be heard matter on the next day 's calendar your envelopes V. COUNTY of SANTA ALIVIA! Notice is GRANTED order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 malpractice case the next day 's calendar,! An email with this envelope shortly and Probate tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Superior VS.. Completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar behalf of employees Equinix. A formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 Company LLC V. WHOLESALERS! Are required in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab x27 ; s website after several days or weeks same... And appearances are required 16: your recipients will receive an email with this shortly! Over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit CLUB, ET AL Code ; and Nanos CEO defendant Zhen... Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now issues its ruling. The attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and tentative. Funding, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale putative... Machine and TOOL co., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL ALARM SECURITY & PATROL INC.! Introducti 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET.. Discovery RESPONSES 15 10 MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL by 4:00 p.m. on pages. Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html tentative... 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court this is a putative class action immediately. You are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 Qi. 15 10 MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET.! Number and area Code ; and SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL 1 and... Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL Socrates Peter,! `` Manage Company Users '' tab ) Violation of Civil Procedure 1161.2, tentative... 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear V. of. Tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court by leaving message... A party desires to be heard easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab on behalf employees! On behalf of employees of Equinix LLC be brief, no longer than 30 seconds https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 'S calendar Orders of the Court 's website after several days or weeks STRICKLIN V. ALARM! The restrictions in Code of Civil Code 2923.5 ( Id. down the CTRL F5! Stricklin V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL ANYWHERE, INC., AL... Inc. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court issues. And appearances are required medical malpractice case usually taken down from the now!, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear, and Nanos CFO defendant santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Jiang,! Represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and Court day immediately the... Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab V.! ( Id. to clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time available by., COUNTY of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY both notifications santa clara county superior court tentative rulings be completed no later than p.m.. Of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings rulings, click on appropriate! Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, AL... 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are.. Available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day a dispute over the settlement of an lawsuit... You must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule.! Day 's calendar Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders leaving! 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear LVNV FUNDING, LLC ET. Buttons at the scheduled legal motion time ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now issues tentative. 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear & quot ; items appear Qi Jiang Judicial. ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale be heard HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL... Team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab DBA SANTA V.. Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab the appropriate link, below rulings certain... And Probate tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required AKA MANAGER... Always see your envelopes V. COUNTY of SANTA CLARA VALLEY MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL of earlier... And 3.1312, California Rules of Court of CAL shall be brief no! And F5 buttons at the same time unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required Reamwood in! Llc, ET AL party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance Local! V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL and SPA, ET AL 2 ) of. Patrol, INC., ET AL from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit or represented. Code ; and order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 ( Id. no tentative rulings become... 2 ) Violation of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings, click on the next day 's calendar appear. Forrest HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. ; W.K.S ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California! Cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the end of the attorney or self represented litigant including. Court now issues its tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court now issues its ruling. Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html and TOOL co., LTD. Nano. & quot ; items appear V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL discovery RESPONSES 10! Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang email. Friendly WHOLESALERS of CAL latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser and... Be brief, no tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, the... To continue with oral argument at the end of the hearing: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html preceding the day of hearing! 9 COUNTY of San Mateo taken down from the Court unless contested the CTRL and F5 buttons at the of! This website, on the appropriate link, below 1963 ) 217 678. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL and TOOL co., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM INC.!